Back
Aajonus responds to Mike Adams
Transcribed
by
Aajonus.net
&
Rawmeatgang
Aajonus
reponds
to
Mike
Adams
articles
on
NaturalNews
titled:
"Rawesome
Bombshell"
and
"Aajonus
Vonderplanitz
PhD".
Infowars
also
did
a
video
report
on
them
which
can
be
found
on
youtube
titled:
"Aajonus
Vonderplanitz,
Rawesome,
Sharon
Palmer
explained
in
HR
interview
on
InfoWars
Nightly
News".
@Archive
F
=
Fred,
A
=
Aajonus
Videographer:
So
go
ahead
and
take
it
from
Fred.
F:
Okay,
take
it
from
the
top
then.
Okay,
I'm
talking
to
Aajonus
Vonderplanitz
today,
and
I'm
going
to
ask
him
for
his
comments
concerning
Mike
Adams'
statements
on
the
Alex
Jones
show,
which
appeared
on
YouTube.
Aajonus,
the
first
thing
that
they
talked
about
on
the
Alex
Jones
show
was
the
fact
that
you're...
on
your
PhD
credentials.
They
basically
were
saying
that
your
PhD
credentials
are
false.
Can
you
comment
on
that?
A:
Love
to.
I've
been
waiting
this
a
long
time.
However,
I
really
don't
like
to
comment
on
hysterical
news
burbs
like
that
that
have
no
basis
in
reality.
And
Mike
Adams,
I
like
him.
I
like
most
of
his
work.
But
this
was
shocking
to
me,
that
personal
attack.
And
we'll
get
into
more
as
you
ask
me
more.
I'm
sure
when
you
ask
me
more,
we'll
get
into
maybe
why
he
did
that.
But
the
credentials,
first
of
all,
the
two
that
they
showed
there
as
a
comparison,
they
said
the
crests
were
the
same
and
everything.
One
was
a
large
silver
crest
and
mine
was
in
gold
and
this
was
smaller.
Mine
had
a
jagged
edge
and
it
was
rounded.
The
print,
the
type
was
similar,
like
he
said,
but
the
one
said
academic
achievement.
Mine
didn't
say
academic
achievement.
And
also,
take
a
look
at
this.
I've
got
two
$100
bills.
Which
one's
counterfeit?
F:
They
both
look
real
to
me.
A:
That's
a
good
counterfeit.
But
the
ones
that
they
showed
was
not
a
good
counterfeit.
It
didn't
match
mine
at
all.
Mine
looked
very,
very
professional.
Also,
on
my
PhD,
as
you
see
right
here,
it
says,
having
demonstrated
ability
by
original
research,
magna
cum
laude,
with
great
distinction
in
nutrition.
It
doesn't
say
anything
about
academic
achievement.
It
says
original
work.
I
invented
a
primal
diet,
a
diet
that
reverses
95%
of
all
diseases.
Most
of
the
time
when
it's
advanced,
it's
with
my
help
that
I'm
giving
personal
recommendations.
However,
from
my
books,
I've
got
two
books
and
two
DVDs.
Here's
one.
I
don't
seem
to
have
my
big
copy,
my
big
book,
but
here's
one
book.
Recipe
for
Living
Without
Disease.
Here's
a
DVD
on
how
to
make
those
recipes
quickly.
And
then,
here's
a
workshop
that
I
did.
It's
a
five
and
a
half
hour
DVD
set
of
a
workshop
at
UCLA
to
teach
people
how
to
do
this
diet.
So,
that
is
what
I
received
that
credential
for,
my
work,
my
original
work.
Not
some
academic
achievement.
I
didn't
sit
in
a
classroom,
no.
I
went
into
a
laboratory.
I
worked
with
people.
I
was
in
the
trenches.
I
just
didn't
get
information.
So,
my
credential,
it
doesn't
matter
that
I
have
that
credential.
They
called
me
and
said,
read
your
books,
love
them.
We'd
like
to
have
you
as
an
alumni
to
raise
the
standard
of
our
university
in
London,
in
the
city
of
London.
So,
I
said,
sure.
I
like
that.
You
help
me,
I
help
you.
But,
does
that
credential
really
help
me?
I
published,
my
book
was
published.
I
didn't
publish
it.
I
was
going
to,
but
then
a
publisher
published
it.
In
1997,
my
book
was
published,
first
book
was
published
on
this
subject.
I'd
gone
all
over
the
world
lecturing,
everywhere,
helping
people.
Doing
quite
well
without
a
PhD
until
2005.
And,
when
2005
came
around
and
they
gave
me
that
PhD,
honorary
PhD,
it
didn't
change
anything.
But,
it
certainly
is
not...
It's
just
an
ornament.
And,
Alex
Jones
says
in,
I
mean,
Mike
Adams
says
in
the
show,
Oh,
this
guy,
you
know,
goes
and
seeks
employment
to
get
a
job
with
this
false
PhD.
He's
got
all
this
nonsense
that
doesn't
relate
to
me
at
all.
I
don't
go
looking
for
work.
How
can
I
go
looking
for
work
as
a
nutritionist?
I
am
self-nutritionist.
I
created
this
diet.
Nobody
can
teach
me.
Nobody
can
hire
me.
I
can
hire
other
people
to
help
me.
So,
the
whole
accusations
have
no
base
in
reality.
There
is
no
research
that
he
did.
He
didn't
go
to
Richmond
University
in
London
to
see
if
that
university
exists.
He
didn't
go.
He
called
Richmond
University,
which
is
not
in
London.
It's
out
40
miles
away.
They're
not
the
same
university.
So,
as
far
as
I
know,
that
university
is
no
longer
existent.
They
didn't
get
enough
of
people
like
me,
I
guess,
to
hold
them
up
to
whatever
stature
they
wanted.
But,
it
doesn't
mean
at
all
that
my
information
is
false,
that
my
life,
my
work
is
false.
Like
he
wants
to,
you
know,
like
he's
insinuating.
And
it's
a
terrible
insinuation.
It's
a
character
bashing
that
has
no
heart
and
no
conscience
and
no
truth,
which
is
a
real
shame.
F:
Wow.
Well,
thank
you.
Now,
what
do
you
have
to
say
about
the
raid
on
Rawesome?
A:
Well,
the
raid
on
Rawesome,
well,
first
of
all,
he
says
that
James
Stewart
created
Rawesome.
James
Stewart
didn't
create
Rawesome
by
himself.
He
and
I
started
it.
At
that
particular
time
in
2000,
the
state
of
California
was
trying
to
outlaw
raw
milk,
which
they
had
done
periodically
for
years.
I'd
been
in
the
raw
milk
movement
and
raw
food
movement
since
1970,
since
I
was
dying
of
cancers
of
blood,
bone,
stomach,
and
lymph.
They'll
say
diabetes
and
other
diseases.
So,
I
was
given
a
death
sentence.
And
someone
turned
me
on
to
raw
milk
and
raw
carrot
juice.
And
it
changed
my
life.
And
that's
what
got
me
into
nutrition.
So,
I'd
been
fighting
raw
milk
for
40
years
before
that
particular
time
of
1999,
2000,
2001,
when
the
state
was
coming
hard
to
stop
raw
milk.
We
can
talk
about
raw
milk
another
time.
But
we
had
no
milk,
so
we
were
going
to
other
places,
other
farms
out
of
the
Los
Angeles
County
to
get
raw
milk
and
bringing
them
in.
So,
we
had
a
garage.
It
was
a
garage
that
James
rented.
And
I
sent
my
patients,
my
clients,
to
him
to
get
the
milk
from
him
because
we
couldn't
get
it
in
stores.
We
couldn't
get
it
anywhere.
So,
together
we
built
up
this
club.
And
then
in
about
2003,
he
decided
to
call
it
Rawesome.
He
threw
out
the
name,
what
do
you
think?
And
I
said,
Great,
great
name.
So,
most
of
the
things
that
happened
at
Rawesome,
we
agreed
upon.
And
always,
as
Rawesome
grew
into
a
larger
food
club,
everything
was
approved
by
me.
All
of
the
food
there
had
to
pass
my
scrutiny.
And
when
it
didn't,
when
it
didn't
fall
into
my
scrutiny,
and
James
Stewart
lied
about
the
quality
of
meats
and
chicken
and
eggs
that
he
was
getting
from
that
farm,
Healthy
Family
Farms
and
Sharon
Palmer,
we
had
a
big
disagreement
and
he
wouldn't
stop.
So,
I
went
to
the
Ventura
County
District
Attorney's
Office
to
file
a
complaint.
And
so,
I
told
them
about
the
food
fraud
that
Sharon
was
throwing
on
us,
lying
to
us,
lying
to
everybody
about
the
quality
of
the
food.
And
that
was
it.
Mike
Adams
says
that
I
was
the
chief
informant.
I
went,
informant?
I
didn't
even
know
these
guys
before
that
day.
I
went
there
to
file
that
complaint.
And
they
wouldn't
even
take
my
complaint.
So,
Mike
Adams
has
blown
this
entire
issue
way
out
of
context
and
way
out
of
truth.
And
we
can
get
into
other
parts
of
that.
But
that's
what
happened
with
Rawesome.
It
was
a
mutual
club.
It
went
bad
with
Sharon
Palmer
and
Healthy
Family
Farms
involved,
with
James,
and
bad
food.
F:
Okay.
Now,
what
about
his
accusation
that
the
lab
tests
which
found
that
the
chicken
was
laced
with,
what
was
it,
arsenic?
He
said
basically
that
those
lab
tests
were
not
valid.
A:
Well,
they're
very
valid.
I
mean,
and
Ms.
Hanson,
he
says
is
not
a
doctor.
No,
she's
not
an
MD,
but
she's
a
licensed
therapist
and
very
credible
person.
And
she
started
having
a
lot
of
problems
about
the
time,
you
know,
when
we
had
had
this
food,
these
eggs
and
chickens
that
weren't
right.
They
started
making
people
ill.
I
noticed
it
too.
Kept
going
to
James
and
Sharon,
saying
what's
going
on.
This
doesn't
seem
right.
We're
having
trouble
with
it.
People
are
complaining
about
how
they're
feeling,
and
it
only
can
relate
to
that
because
that's
the
only
food
we've
changed
in
all
of
Rawesome.
Denial,
denial,
denial,
denial.
That,
and
then
we
had
a,
there
was
a
time
that
I
went
up
to
Sacramento
to
fight
for
raw
milk
again,
and
I
met
a
woman
up
there
who
had
worked
at
Rawesome
for
about
a
year
and
a
half,
and
also
had
worked
for
Sharon
at
Healthy
Family
Farms.
And
she
told
me
that
she
had
worked
at
Healthy
Family
Farms
for,
you
know,
several
weeks
and
was
fired
because
she
went
to
James
and
said,
James,
Sharon
is
feeding
soy
and
GMO
corn
to
the
chickens
for
chicken
meat
and
chicken
eggs.
And
she
was
feeding
it
to
the
other
animals
too.
And
James
and
I
agreed
that
there
should
be
no
soy
and
no
GMO
corn
in
the
feed.
And
here
for
two
years
they
were
claiming
that
it
was
clean.
And
this
was
in
May
2009,
excuse
me,
May
2009,
no,
this
was
May
2010.
So
I,
for
the
next
six
months,
investigated
as
much
as
I
could.
Finally
we
got
an
investigative
firm
to
look
into
it.
And
we
found
extensive
evidence
that
she
was
buying
commercial
feed.
Not
only
buying
commercial
feed,
she
was
buying
commercial
eggs
and
commercial
meats
and
then
selling
them
to
James
Stewart
to
pawn
off
as
grown
on
her
farm
as
completely
organic.
And
none
of
the
feed
was
even
organic.
The
labels
were
right
there.
And
this
woman
that
I
was
telling
you
about
that
told
me
that
worked
at
both
Rawesome
and
Healthy
Family
Farms,
she
read
the
label.
Not
organic
and
full
of,
you
know,
toxic
products.
So
that
is
the
true
story,
Mike
Adams,
why
he's
gone
renegade
and
testified
so
much
bad
information.
It
just
makes
him
look
like
a
bad
investigator,
like
he's
done
very
shallow
work.
And
what
he
accuses
other
news
commentators
and
publishers
about,
he's
always
bragging
about
him
being
the
best
and
most
accurate
and
honest.
Not
honest
at
all.
And,
you
know,
I
thought
he
was
great
before
this.
So
I
question
everything
he
says
now.
I
won't
take
anything
he
says
as
truth
unless
I
investigate
it
myself.
And
I'm
not
going
to
do
it,
if
I'm
going
to
investigate
something,
I'm
not
going
to
do
it
shallowly
like
he
did.
So
why
he
took
James
Stewart's
side
and
Sharon
Palmer's,
I
don't
know.
But
if
you
want
to
ask
me
about
those
two,
I
can
comment
about
those
two.
F:
Well,
you
said
something
about
Sharon's
previous
criminal
history.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
get
into
that.
A:
Oh,
well,
Mike
didn't
even
say
about
her
past
criminal
history.
She
was
found
guilty
and
sentenced
to
prison
for
elderly
fraud.
That
means
she
defrauded,
she
and
her
husband.
She
blames
it
all
on
her
husband.
But
from
the
information
I
got
from
some
reporters
and
one
of
the
victims,
that
she
did
all
the
setting
up
and
her
husband
came
in
for
the
close.
But
she
claims
that
she
wasn't
involved,
that
she
was
a
duped.
And
her
husband
took
her
down
that
road.
This
went
on
for
seven
or
eight
years.
You
can't
be
duped
that
long.
Maybe
a
week
or
two
if
you
were
in
that
kind
of
situation.
But
there
was
something
like
$13,
$16
million
involved.
I
don't
remember
the
exact
figures.
But
it
was
pretty
high.
So
what
she
and
her
husband
would
do
is
they
would
tell
these
elderly
people,
we'll
get
you
a
loan
and
you'll
get
so
much
every
month.
And
then,
of
course,
the
house,
you'll
get
money
every
month
and
you
don't
have
to
worry
about
your
bills.
And
then
the
house
will
go
into
some
kind
of
escrow
for
the
bank
or
some
other
thing,
some
Ponzi
schemes
is
what
it
was.
And
they
would
give
that
elderly
person
or
those
elderly
people
money
for
about
five,
seven
months,
maybe
12
months,
and
all
of
a
sudden
stop
paying
the
mortgage.
And
then
those
elderly
people
would
be
evicted.
Elderly
people,
80-year-old
people,
60-year-old
people,
70-year-old
women,
out
in
the
street,
homeless.
That's
the
kind
of
individual
that
Mike
Adams
is
backing.
And
James
with
his
food
fraud
along
with
her.
Those
aren't
good
people
to
back.
And,
yes,
I
filed
suit
against
them,
and
it's
supposed
to
go
to
trial
in
a
few
weeks,
trying
to
get
it
delayed
until
June
because
I
have
a
tour
to
finish.
The
trial
is
supposed
to
come
earlier.
But
if
anybody
really
wants
to
know
what
the
true
evidence
is,
come
to
the
trial.
Los
Angeles,
111
Hill
Street,
downtown
Los
Angeles,
in
the
civil
building.
And
come
and
watch.
You'll
find
out
exactly.
All
the
stuff
that
Mike
Adams
said
was
false,
every
bit.
F:
Very
good.
I'll
be
there.
A:
Okay,
good.
F:
Okay,
thanks,
Aajonus.
A:
You're
very
welcome.
Okay,
yep.
I
think
we
covered
enough
information
on
that.